 |
| |
|
|
| |
bill belichick football quotes
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"Once players understand concepts, you have the flexibility to interweave the
concepts into sound, fundamental plays that deal with the concepts an offense
throws at you. If you can take 75 plays and boil them into 10 concepts, then a
player only needs to learn 10 things before he can get out on the field."
si, jan 2007 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
who is the most talented athlete he's ever coached
"I would have to say Lawrence Taylor. I would just say that I probably coached a number of players, a dozen players, with as much talent as Lawrence Taylor that you've probably never heard of, but they just didn't have the desire or the ability to take that talent and transfer it onto the football field. They were good individual athletes, but they weren't necessarily good football players, relative to players like Tom Brady or Troy Brown, or players like that who few would say, 'This is the greatest athlete I've ever coached.' But Tom Brady is probably the greatest football player I've ever coached."
boston globe, may 2008 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
how to improve at the game of football
"I think football, as we all know, is a sport where you can't just improve during the game, because there's not enough games. It's not like baseball where you play every day. The chance to improve in football is on the practice field. And if you don't improve on the practice field then your growth as a player is going to be very minimal – there just aren't enough games. So a player's got to…to be a good football player and to develop as a player, he's got to work hard to prepare himself for practice, and practice well. And that's the way it is for everybody. I know that Steve and Scott would both tell you – and they've heard me say to players when they're walking around listening to…with their headphones and their Walkman and their iPod and all that – that I tell them, 'Why don't you try listening to your playbook? Why aren't you spending the same amount of time reading your playbook as you do listening to garbage that's on that iPod … and you'd be a lot better off. Your football career would be a lot better off and you'll be listening to music a lot longer if you would do that. And I've also, at times, threatened to take those away from them and give them one that had nothing but their assignments on it. You know, that's really what it comes down to. If you want to improve as a football player, you've got to improve in your preparation, you've got to improve on the practice field, because there's just not enough games. I mean, you can improve in games, but there's just not enough games! Not like baseball, where you're playing every day. … I'm talking about young guys that come in here and they walk in with their headphones on and they're zippity-do-dahing along and they have time for everything but the playbook, film and the weight room. But they have time to go to McDonald's, they have time to listen to music, they have time to run around and drive their car around and zip around to all the different spots. Well, you know what, they're not going to last very long, because nobody's that good – or, very few are – and everybody else is going to come in and out-compete those guys and out-work them, and they'll just be better than them. That's where the Wes Welkers and the Tom Bradys and the Adalius Thomases and the Tedy Bruschis and guys like that – the Rodney Harrisons that were picked in the fourth, sixth, free agents and all that – that's why those guys have passed up so many other players with a lot more ability. They just out-work them and out-compete them on a day-to-day basis. … [T]he guy who really isn't willing to do that really isn't going to last very long in this program. And it's more a question of whether I get him first or the veteran players get him first and just get fed up with it, because we all work too hard to have guys come in here and not be willing to pay that same kind of price and support the program. If they're on their own program, then pretty soon they just probably need to go to another one."
weei, 28 apr 2008
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
what criteria he uses to decide whether or not to practice in pads
"Whatever we think is best for the football team. And that includes everything. Any time you take into consideration what you need to do from a coaching standpoint, how you need to prepare your team, each of the individual players or the groups, it's probably not going to be 100 percent one way or the other. So, you decide, 'We'll do this,' and that's maybe what you think is overall best for the team, even though it might not be the greatest thing for some other constituency. That's just the way it is. If there's one perfect thing to do for everybody, then that makes the decision easy. It doesn't matter what the decision is. It could be practice, it could be scheduling, it could be whatever. But in the end, I just try to take into consideration what I think is best for the overall good of our football team in every decision that I make, so they're all the same, from that standpoint."
27 dec 2007 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
on when you set your defense
"The two things you can control on defense when you make the call in the huddle is down-and-distance and personnel. So you know what the down and distance is, you know what personnel they have in the game and so now you make your call. Now, at that point you could have a call that just plays against everything…or you could have a call that maybe plays like this against one set and like something else in another set. Like if they lineup one back in the backfield you play one thing, if they lineup two backs in the backfield you play something else, or if they lineup in a slot formation you play one coverage or one deal and then if they lineup at something else you play something else. So there could be an element of that where even once you see the formation then you check the defense based on formation. So really the two elements you always have are down-and-distance and personnel, and then once you see the formation you have some ability to adjust your defense at that point."
17 sept 2007 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
if he regards extra points as automatic
"No, I don't think it's automatic play by any stretch. I think it's an
important play. When I watch a team, one of the first things that I look for
when I'm looking at a team for the first time, we're getting ready to play
the team 'X', you go through and you look at the team, I always watch their
field goal and extra point rush. I think that gives you a good indication of
what type of team and what type of effort they have. You see teams on the
extra points where if they want to consider it automatic and just stand and
watch the guy kick it, I think that tells you one thing about the
competitive level of the team and that unit. Then there are other teams that
it's an extra point and I tell you, you better buckle up because they're
going to roll you over. You might have just scored on them, but now you're
going to have to work hard if you want this extra point. I think that says a
lot about the competitiveness and the toughness of some of the individual
players on that team, and the overall team. Because a lot of times when you
watch that play, you don't see everybody on the rush going at 100 percent
maximum effort. You might see some players going at maybe their best effort,
and there might be other guys that might be a little bit less than that. I
think that starts to give you a little bit of an indication of what some of
those players are about, as well. Without trying to over dramatize the play,
I'm just saying when I look at it, it means something to me."
28 dec 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
differences in the fundamentals of ball security
"Some players have certain preferences and feel more confident having
the ball in a certain hand or maybe catching it a certain way. If they're
able to do that successfully and consistently, then I don't have any problem
with that. That's not the way I would teach it necessarily to a young player
who didn't have a preference that was a habit for him. Again, it goes back
to my experience with a player like Everson Walls who did a lot of things
that weren't technically probably the way you would teach. It definitely
wouldn't be the way you would teach a young defensive back to do them. The
guy had 56 career interceptions. I think there's a certain amount of
latitude for a player within techniques and his playing style, as long as he
can do it productively and effectively. Basic fundamentals of catching the
ball, depending on where the ball is located, proper hand placement, thumbs
together, thumbs apart, securing the ball at the three points of contact,
the nose of the ball, the outside forearm, rib cage, playing with good body
lean. There are a million things that go into it and you teach all of those
things and you teach them from day one. Again, some players don't do all of
those things by the book, just like some passers throw three-quarter
sidearm. Some receivers don't always use great hand placement or they body
catch a little bit, but if they're consistently productive, then you can
accept some of those things."
22 dec 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
the defensive line and the linebackers
"It definitely all starts up front.
It all starts up front. If you're playing linebacker, for
you to play consistently, the guy in front of you has to
play consistently. If he doesn't do his job consistently,
then you're always kind of playing off of him. Do you go
wider? Do you go tighter? Do you back up? You never really
know where the guy is going to be on different blocking
schemes and it's hard for you to play consistently. If you
know where that person is going to be, then it allows you to
play aggressively because you're confident in where he's
going to fit on different running plays and you can attack
your responsibility. It starts on the defensive line and it
works back to the next level at linebacker and it works back
to the next level in the secondary. In order to be
consistent and be good on defense, it has a start up front.
It has to start up front. If it doesn't, if you're not
consistent there, then it's just going to roll down hill and
pick up speed. If you're good up front, then that gives you
a chance to be consistent in the areas that play behind you.
Just like the secondary when they come up in their run
force, they're depending on the outside linebackers. If they
know where the outside linebackers are going to be, then
they can fit off of them and play aggressively in the right
spot. If they don't, they always have to wait and see where
the linebackers are going to show up and they can never really go where they're supposed to go because you can't
count on linebackers to be there. So it's the same thing.
Anytime you're playing behind somebody, it's hard for you to
be consistent at the second level until they're consistent
at the first level. That's just fundamental football."
06 dec 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
expectations
"I try not to have too many expectations with players. I'd rather just
coach them and see what they can do."
27 nov 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
what makes a good holder
"A good holder is a player that, first of all, has good hands, and second of all, can get the ball right on the spot on a consistent basis. If
that ball is off the spot – forward, backward,
sideways – then that affects the kick and that
increases the margin of error. Ideally, you'd just like to place the ball on
[one of] those little holders there where you place the ball and the kicker walks
off his steps. It's like teeing it up on the driving range. But the snap and
the hold and getting the ball right on that spot, it's never exactly on it;
there's always a little variation, but you want it there as closely as
possible. And when the holder looks up to get the snap and then takes the
snap then reaches down and re-spots it and puts the proper lean on it and all that,
sometimes the snap…there's a little variation in that. So to get the ball right there
for the kicker, that's a big part of the operation. And when it's not there,
then the kicker, who's already kind of left off his right foot right, or is leaving off his right foot right as the ball
is being spotted, then whatever variation there is in the hold, he has to try
to make
that adjustment between the time his right foot leaves the ground and his left
foot hits it so he can have a consistent plant and kick. It's definitely a
skill. And really the only way to watch a holder is to have a good
close-up film, where you have your cameraman at an angle where the holder is
really the whole guy in the picture, because that is the margin of error on
the hold and the lean of the ball and so forth. That is how you try to coach
it and shoot it. It's sort of hard. You can see it with the naked eye, but
it's a lot better when you get good, close-up, slow-motion film."
24 nov 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
when asked what he thought the major differences were between offensive
game-planning against a 3-4 as opposed to a 4-3 defense
"I think it depends on
what type of defense you're playing against. There are a lot
of different versions of a 3-4 and a 4-3. You have 4-3 teams
that are over and under teams, that are blitz zone teams,
that are man-to-man coverage teams, that are pretty much
zone teams that mix them. Same thing with 3-4 defenses. So I
think it really depends on not so much what front they line up in, but what style of play they have and what
you're going to try to do with it – how
to attack it from a coverage standpoint and how to deal with
the pass protections and your assignments in the running
game. And again, that to me really depends a lot more on
how they play it than what they initially line up in."
22 nov 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
explaining Cover-2, Cover-3, and Cover-4
"Those numbers signify how many players are in the deep part of the
field. So in Cover-2 you have the two safeties that are in the deepest part
of the field and basically five players in the underneath zone. In [Cover-] 3, you have three players in the
deep part of the field and basically four players in the underneath
zones. And in 4-coverage, you have four players potentially in
the deep part of the field if they send four
receivers deep; if they only send three receivers deep then
you'd only have three and if they only send two, you'd only have two.
But it's how many players defend the deep part of the field and that,
naturally, is reciprocal to how many players you have defending the
underneath areas. So if they're throwing short, you'd like to be Cover-2 and
have that extra guy down there. If they're throwing deep, you'd like to be
in Cover-4 and be able to carry four vertical receivers. If you want to be
somewhere in the middle, then that's kind of Cover-3. So that's sort of
where that comes from."
20 nov 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
about Vince Lombardi
"It was a little bit of a different game when he coached it.
I think the big thing with Lombardi was that he was all
about execution. It wasn't like they'd had a lot of new or
exotic plays or things like that. Pretty much everybody knew
what they were going to do, but they had a hard time
stopping it. They had good players, and he was a very
disciplined coach and they executed their plays extremely
well on a consistent basis. So whether it be [Bart] Starr
and the passing game, or [Paul] Hornung and [Jim] Taylor and
the offensive line and the running game, or with [Ray]
Nitschke and [Willie] Davis and all those guys on defense.
They were just a solid, consistent, week after week…like
the [Don] Shula teams were, except I thought that the Shula
teams had a lot more variety, kind of a little bit of the
Paul Brown-type of offense and defense where it seemed like
they were more innovative and creative. And I'm not taking
anything away from anybody, I'm just saying it was just a
contrast in styles."
about Lombardi saying that only two things mattered in
football, blocking and tackling
"I think they're very important. I think that
throwing and catching and covering have a lot more to do
with it now than they did 40 or 50 years ago. Without
blocking and tackling you can't block and you don't have
much on offense; and if you can't tackle, you don't have
much on defense. So it has to start there, no question about
it. But I think that the skills that we see on a weekly
basis in this league, as it relates to the passing game,
they're pretty important too."
16 nov 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
protecting the quarterback
"Tell me a
game where the quarterback hasn't been hurried. Let me know
when one of those games comes along so I make sure I
identify it. Every quarterback gets hurried and every
quarterback gets hit. You want it to be as few as possible.
Sometimes you break down on your protection or your pickup,
sometimes they have a free guy and you have to get the ball
off before he gets there and he still gets there.
There are a lot of different things that can happen. You
always want your protection to be better. But the best way
to protect the quarterback is to have a big lead, run the
ball, and throw it when you feel like throwing it because
they're not really rushing, they're playing the run. So if
you can ever get into that situation, that's the best way to
protect your quarterback. But that's not always the
situation you're in."
13 nov 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
playing time
"As players have heard me say many times, they don't control playing
time, they control their performance when they're on the field. Coaches
control playing time. That's what a coach's job is: call plays, make
substitutions, prepare the team. A player's job is to be ready to play when
he's called on. And when he's called on and gets the opportunity, go out
there and play the best he can. That's what every player's job is. They're
all told the same thing."
13 nov 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
a particular player's potential to be a good leader
"First of all, I think every player on our team has leadership
qualities. They have different styles – some
guys are vocal, some guys aren't, some guys lead more by example, other guys
get more into groups and kind of work with groups and kind of bring them
together. So that's an individual type of thing. But I think in terms of Ellis'
[Hobbs]
work ethic, his toughness, his competitiveness, his real ability to want to
help the team and want to play well and play within the team concept, I think
those things are definitely positives. But I think every player in that
locker room has leadership ability. Any person in any group has the ability
to be a leader, and that leadership comes with their attitude, it comes with
their preparation, it comes with their work ethic. If somebody is prepared
to work and they come in and work hard and they are committed to the group,
whatever it is, then how can the group not respect him and not see that as
positive leadership? That's kind of what we feel about our team. But I would
see that in any group, I think."
09 nov 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
playing an opponent who is coming off of a bye week
"Each
team normally has seven days to prepare after the game's over on Sunday
night. So the challenge from Monday or Tuesday, whichever day you want to
say is your starting point, until let's say Sunday at kickoff, is
which team is better prepared? And one team is better prepared than
the other. I don't know which one it is, but one of them has to be better
prepared than the other based on their film study, their meetings, their
practice sessions and so forth. And then you go out there and play the game.
So you can gain an edge on your opponent in those practice opportunities and
meeting opportunities. Again, it's hard to measure, but hey, they have the
same amount of time as you do; who is doing more with it?"
06 nov 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
getting over a loss
"You get to a certain point where you're done, you've mourned, you've
had the funeral. It's time to bury it and move on and get on with the next
game. That's the only choice."
06 nov 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
playing the same team twice in one season
"I think you can take the information and analyze what happened in other
games, but ultimately it doesn't really matter what happened last week or
last year. The only thing that matters is what's going to happen this
Sunday, and how the two teams this Sunday compete against each other and how
they play. It doesn't matter who the better team is, it doesn't matter who
has a better record, it doesn't matter how many Pro Bowl players one team
has or the other team doesn't have, it just matters how good you can go out
and play this week. I think that's really where I try to generate my energy,
and our coaches do, is how to get our team to play its best football
collectively on Sunday afternoon."
18 oct 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
why some guys are better at punt return than kickoff return
"It's a totally different skill. The ball handling is different – punts are harder to handle than kickoffs. On
kickoffs, you catch the ball and run, whatever, 15 or 20 yards before you
really run into any opponents. On punt returns, a lot of times you have a
guy right on top of you as soon as you catch the ball. So you're talking
about a different skill, a different amount of space. Speed is a factor
getting back up the field on kickoff returns. Where a lot of times on punt
returns, speed is not a factor until you can get into the open field and get
running. So quickness is an issue, to be able to make somebody miss who is
right on top of you and get away from the guy in a short space. Obviously,
it's good to have all three. It's good to have strength, speed, and
quickness, and then no matter what you're dealing with, you have a good way
to handle it, if you have the ball in your hands. But if you only have one
or two of those – I mean, I'm sure they're all good for all returners, but
I'm saying really at the exceptional level, like with [Miami Dolphins WR
Wes] Welker. He's very fast and he's very quick, so he's tough on kick
returns because he builds so much speed and he's so fast hitting the hole,
and he's quick to make people miss. Whereas on punt returns, he's quick to
make people miss and then once he gets a little bit of space then he's fast,
and that's where a fast punt returner is really dangerous, because when
you're covering a punt, you just aren't covering with as many fast people as
you are with a kickoff – you have a snapper, you
have a punter there, you don't have the kind of leverage that you have on a
kickoff, where everybody is balanced and running down the field. You have
guys coming off blocks, and they're trying to get into their lanes, and it's
just not as clean. So you hardly ever start with the coverage fanned out
like you do on kickoffs, where it's all fanned out and then it condenses. On
a punt, you get guys banged around, so you have too many people over here
and not enough over there, and you're kind of trying to weave back into the
lanes. Like I said, you're covering them with bigger players because they
have to protect, whereas on kickoffs you're just looking for guys that can
run and play in space. You have a better team covering kickoffs,
athletically and speed-wise, usually than you do covering punts. Plus, like
I said, you don't have a long snapper out there, so you have one more guy."
06 oct 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
the practice squad
"Those guys are important because they show the complementary group kind
of what to expect, and run the plays as close as we can get them to the way
that … whoever our opponent is does it. Those guys are an important part
of the team. They kind of go unmentioned and unsung a little bit because
they don't play in the games. In terms of preparing the team, both on a
scheme basis, showing the team the way the players look, and also
individually after practice, like if you want to work on something with a
particular player against a speed rush or against a certain type of route or
blitz pickup, then those guys do a great job of that, too. They're really an
important part of the team even though, again, they don't play. What they do
to prepare the team to play is very important. … They're certainly aware
of the things that we're doing because we've all seen, just like last week
… how on Saturday they could be called up and be playing on Sunday. We
also try to make them aware in some other individual meetings and stuff like
that, kind of aware of what the opponents do and how they do it so that they
can simulate that in practice."
05 oct 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
the passing game
"What the passing comes down to is the timing and execution. That's true
of every team in this league. It doesn't matter what level you throw the
ball at. It's a combination of the throwing and the catching of the skill
players and the protection of the blockers, which includes backs and tight
ends. If a team pressures, they are involved in the protection, too. What
you want to do is protect the quarterback. Whether you're throwing
three-step drop or seven-step drop or whatever the pattern is, protect him
long enough so he can drop back and get set and throw the ball on time. The
receivers need to get open and come open on time when the quarterback is
ready to throw. Not a second before he's ready, not a second after he's
ready. That's just not the way to do it. You might get away with one here or
there, but that's not the way to do it. So all of that needs to be
synchronized and if it is, then you have a well executed passing game. If it
isn't, then something's going to go wrong. We are all part of that.
Sometimes the receiver is open and the quarterback can't throw. Sometimes
the quarterback can throw and the protection is good and the receiver is not
able to get open on the route, or the distribution of the receivers is wrong
and then the quarterback doesn't have a clear throwing lane. Sometimes the
guy drops the ball. Sometimes the quarterback makes a bad throw. Sometimes
it gets tipped. There's a lot of things that could happen in the passing
game. If you throw the ball well, you're completing in the mid-60s, the high 60 percents. Not 90 percent, that's a good passing game. You're completing
68, 67 percent of your passes, that's good. If you're the best passing team
in football, you're probably going to miss one out of three. The difference
between hitting one or two more per game is the difference between having an
okay passing game and having a good passing game."
04 oct 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
the father of pro football
"Paul Brown really, to me, he's the father of pro football. There are so
many things that he did as a coach, with the Browns and the Bengals,
it's what we do now. He was half a [century] ahead of his time in so many
areas – preparation, plays, techniques, communication, nomenclature. Pretty
much everything that is done in the NFL, he did. Now, there are different
systems, there are different ways of doing it, but nobody did it before he
did. A lot of what we do now really has its roots with Paul. The West Coast
Offense, that clearly is Paul Brown's offense. That's what he ran. All the
elements that have trickled through in the various decades, that's really
the origin of it. But preparation, scouting, game-planning, taxi squad, draw
and screen passes, blocking techniques – he did it all."
29 sept 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
how a defensive back can overcome the size differential
against a taller receiver
"The first thing is position, and the second thing is
timing. It's not always about who's the tallest guy, but it's
timing and how much you're able to elevate and get up there to
the highest point. It's like rebounding in basketball. You get a
guy like Charles Barkley that led the league in rebounding at,
what was he, 6'4"? You don't have to be 7'2" to lead the league
in rebounding. You have to be able to jump, you have to be able
to get position, you have to be able to get the ball – that's
true whether you're a receiver or a defensive back. It's not all about height. That can be an advantage, but unless that
guy is also the highest jumper and has the best timing and best
hands and all that, that may not necessarily be an advantage. It
may just be part of an advantage, not the total picture."
27 sept 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
if the quarterback reads the receiver's body movement
"That's what a good receiver should do. A good
receiver should, with his body movement, basically be telling
the quarterback, 'I'm getting ready to make my break. Now is
when you want to throw me the ball.' Without anybody saying a
word, that's kind of what the quarterback should see and that's
what the receiver should do. He should give some type of an
indication to the quarterback, 'Get ready because this is where
I'm going to make my break. This is where I'm going to make my
move.' That's what the passing game is."
(This press conference includes an in-depth explanation about
the technique of receivers.)
22 sept 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
if players keep books on the guys they go up against
"When you play against a player, you want to do your
preparation on him [and] keep it on record. The next time you go
against that guy, whether it's with that team or somebody else,
there's going to be certain things that are going to carry over.
The scheme might be different, but the player is still going to
have his basic physical strengths and weaknesses, and he'll
probably use some of the same techniques on his routes, whether
it's head-faking or stuttering, uppercut release or swim
release, whatever their techniques are. I think that's across
the board, whether it's linemen against linemen, or wide
receivers against DBs, tight ends against outside linebackers. I
think that's what a good football team and good football players
do. I think they should all do that."
22 sept 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
playing good defense
"Defense – don't make it too complicated.
Our job on defense is to get the guy with the ball. That's
it. It doesn't matter who's got it, where he's got it, our
job is to get him and get him down. If you haven't done
that, then you're not playing good defense. Whoever's got
it, we've got to get him down. Whether we trip him up by a
shoestring, whether we wrap him up and have a perfect form
tackle that ends up on the highlight reel – however you get
them – if you get them, then that's good. If you don't get
them…you could do ten things right on a play and then miss
a tackle and it's a bad play. You can do ten things right in
covering a receiver, and then miss-play the ball or
miss-time the jump or something – let him take it away from
you and the guy gains whatever – it's a bad play. So,
finishing plays on defense, making the tackle, getting the
guy with the ball, like I said, don't make it too hard. If
we do that, then it's a good play. If we don't, then we're
not going to be happy with it."
21 sept 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
the biggest challenge of defending the no-huddle
"Communication, whichever side of it you are on. If you were
running it or you were defending against it, everything goes a
little bit quicker. You just have to have communication with all
11 players, however that's done. When you huddle, it's a little
bit easier because you have them all right there, although a lot
of times that changes after the huddle breaks anyway based on if
the offense is audibling, if the defense is checking a coverage
or whatever. I think the big thing is communication."
13 sept 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
stopping the opponent on fourth down
"I think it's like a turnover. A fourth down stop is like a
turnover. A missed field goal is like a turnover. Those plays
don't go down as turnovers, but they really are. It's no
different if you intercepted a pass or recovered a fumble. Of
course, the key thing after that [is being] able to do something
with it offensively. "
10 sep 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
reactionary football
"Defensive football is reactionary
football. No matter what position you play, you have
to, in some degree, react to what the offense is doing.
That's every position across the board. Whereas offensively,
you're playing more assignment football. Based on
where they are there's a certain thing we've got to do to
execute the play, and you follow that assignment. Then as
you do that, then you have to react to the defense moves
after the snap – which a lot of
times they do, so then that becomes reactionary. But
I think defensively, really, it's all reactionary. I
mean, yeah, you have a basic assignment, but that
assignment, there's no way it can be the same on every play.
It depends on what the offensive guy does, what your
offensive keys do. Then, you have certain reactions to those
actions. … But each player has a little bit different
playing style. Even though you give a player a certain basic
assignment on the play, it can vary from individual to
individual on, sometimes, how they play it, or because of
their strengths or weaknesses in their particular playing
style, or physical abilities or whatever it is. One guy
might play it a little bit differently from the next guy but
still play within the framework of his responsibility."
24 aug 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
two-a-days in training camp
"When we went to training camp at Baltimore [in 1975]…it
went from July 5 until the middle of August. It was like six
weeks of two-a-days. I look at the two-a-days in the league now
and it's like six, seven or eight days. It varies a little bit
from team to team, but that's about the average number. These
guys have no concept of what training camp was 30 years ago. You
can't tell them that, I tell them that but they don't really
want to hear that."
28 jul 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
what a good football player is all about
"It was certainly a great opportunity for me to have the
privilege – I really mean that, the
privilege – to coach Harry. He's as
easy a player as there ever was to coach. He's well prepared,
worked hard, and always put the team first. That's really what,
to me, a good football player is all about."
18 july 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
consistency
"I think it's always easier for everybody when there's
consistency around them. That doesn't let them off the hook,
but it makes it easier to execute their assignment when everybody
else is consistently doing a better job with what they're doing."
05 jan 2006 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
about the coaching staff he assembled in
Cleveland
"It was special and I knew that at that time. I told the
owner that several times too, when he had some questions about
how the coaching was going. I thought it was a pretty good staff
then and you could throw a lot of other people in there with
that too. The Chuck Bresnahans and other guys that are
coordinators like that, Jimmy Schwartz. You can just go right
down the line. Scott O'Brien. There are a lot of good coaches
there. Rick Venturi. Jim Bates. Jacob Burney. You could start a
list on a lot of them. Hey, not that we didn't make mistakes in
Cleveland. I made plenty of them and there were certainly things
that we could've done better, but I don't think the quality of
the coaching staff was the major problem there. I definitely
wouldn't say that. I do take pride in that. They are good
coaches and I learned a lot from a lot of them, most of them. I
learned a lot from Nick. Nick is a great coach. He brought some
ideas and brought some things to that programs that we certainly
wouldn't have had without him. That was a great learning
experience for me. I know he said he learned things in
Cleveland, but I might have learned more from him than he
learned from me. I'll tell you that. He's really a good coach.
He did a great job. He brought a lot of good things to that
program."
29 dec 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
on-field celebrating
"Jim Brown and I talked about this. He feels as soon as the play
is over, you should be thinking about the next one. There were times
when Jim played that he was slow getting back to the huddle, and it
might have looked like something other than it was, but in his mind,
as he was walking back, he was already getting himself into the
proper mind-set to think about the next situation." Belichick said spontaneous celebrations are fine, but staged
antics have no place on the field. "This is the way I was
brought up. It's the only way I've ever seen it. At the Naval
Academy, it was all about teamwork and what the team embodied."
25 dec 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
about record-holding receiver Don Hutson
"We were just going over a little history. Going back a little
ways. Don Hutson, we were talking about a real receiver. He still
holds 10 NFL records. With Jerry Rice and Steve Largent and all of
the other guys that have played, can you imagine him still holding
10 records? … He revolutionized the game … He was the first
receiver. The first guy that really ran pass patterns. He really ran
patterns and was kind of the forerunner to Johnny Unitas, Raymond
Berry, there were a lot of guys in between, but you know guys that
actually ran routes as opposed to just go out and throw them the
ball, split out. It was pretty revolutionary."
09 dec 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
mental errors
"Mental mistakes are always an issue with every team. You're
always trying to minimize them, and the fewer you have the better
off you are. Sometimes you have them and they don't hurt you.
Sometimes you make a mental error, but the play is such that it
doesn't matter, it doesn't hit that point. There are other times
when it does. Our goal every week is zero. I'm sure that is every
team's goal. Probably no team ever hits it, but that's the goal of
every week. You want to go in there and try not to have any mental
assignments. If you get beat, you get beat physically but you don't
get beat mentally. That's what everybody tries to do. But there are
always going to be some things – and they try to create them. That's
what the other team tries to do. They game-plan you and try to put
you in a stress situation where you have to make a call, you have to
make an adjustment, you have to do something on the run, and
sometimes you don't get it. Have we had them? Yeah, we've always had
them and I'm sure we always will have them. We'll never be satisfied
with them; [we'll] always try to get them out of there.
Unfortunately, it's like dropped balls or missed tackles or guys
slipping down on the ground. Unfortunately that stuff is going to
happen to every team. You just want to have it as few as possible."
02 dec 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
overcoming inconsistency
"You keep working on it. You keep stressing the things that are
important to your team playing good, consistent football. All of
those things. Knowing the play. Communication. Technique.
Assignment. Certain things to anticipate on different plays or
against different looks. All of the fundamentals of leverage and
hand placement. All of those things. In the end, that's what leads
to good football, is doing all the little things right. So you keep
coaching those. You keep working on them."
02 dec 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
the most important aspect of dealing with players
"Be direct with them. Don't tell them what they want to
hear, but rather the way that it is."
20 nov 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
what coaching is
"I think coaching is getting the player to do the right thing in
the right situation, and, make the right judgment…. It's about
decision-making. That's read, recognition, and decision-making."
17 nov 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
preparation
"That's how we prepare for every game, is that we expect for
it to come down to critical situations at the end of the game.
We need to understand how those teams historically, or by our
scouting report, play in those situations – what they do, what we
should be prepared for – and we work on that. We work on the
2-minute offense, when we're behind and need to score. We work
on the 4-minute offense, when we're ahead and are trying to
protect the lead. We work on different kicking situations,
no-huddle field goals, last rush, all those kinds of things that
it could come down to, those kinds of game-deciding type plays.
We work on those every week. Because, again, the expectation is
that in this league, when half the games are going to be decided
by less than a touchdown anyway – just playing the
percentages – that's the type of game you're going to be in an
awful lot. You'd better be ready for all those situations,
because that could decide the outcome."
11 nov 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
intimidation
"I think what's intimidating on a football field is good team football.
That's what's intimidating. When you have everybody playing well together and
complementing each other and have a good complementary game and the whole team
working together as a unit, whether it's offense, defense or special teams, or
all three of them, working collectively. I think that's really what the hardest
thing is for an opponent to deal with, as opposed to waving a towel or that type
of deal."
20 oct 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
execution
"If you can execute the play and make it work, then you're going to create
your own momentum. If you don't, then there's only so much that can come
externally. It's got to come from the execution on the field or the play
sequence that you choose to employ at that point."
17 oct 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
defensive football
"What you need to think about is how do I defeat the guy who
is assigned to block me? That's what defensive football is
really about. Everybody is assigned to block somebody, how do I
defeat him and get to the ball? Not, 'Where is the shortcut? How
can I cut across this lot and get to that point without having
to walk all the way around the sidewalk?' Well you know what?
There's a fence there. It just doesn't work that way. You have
to do that and you have to deal with whatever is in your way as you meet it. You
interview these guys coming out of college, 'How do you see
yourself as a defensive player?' [They will answer,] 'I can run
to the ball, like when I'm just set free. I can cut it lose in
pursuit.' Great. [There are] 11 guys on defense who would love
to have that. Nobody blocks them. They just run free. They make
the tackle. It's so ridiculous….
"They just have no concept of reality
in a lot of cases. In the end they might be good athletes, but a
lot of those guys are really not very good football players
because they don't understand what being a defensive football
player means. You have to deal with somebody along the way.
'Well they blocked me and that's why I couldn't make the play.'
Well, yeah, they're going to try to block you. Your job is to
not get blocked. Not, 'Well they blocked me, so somebody else
needs to make the play.'…
"The right answer to the question is
the way that Pepper Johnson played football. And his attitude,
[was] 'You can't block me. I'm here. Go ahead. You can't block
me.' That's the way it should be for everybody. 'You can't block
me. You want to cut me? I'm going to get over that cut block.
You want to come in and be physical with me? I'm going to knock
you out of there. You want to run outside? I'm going to run you
down. I know you have somebody assigned to me. That doesn't mean
anything.' Everybody has somebody assigned to them. Just the way
Pepper would talk to the secondary. He was great. You couldn't
ask to coach a better guy than Pepper. [He would say,] 'You guys
just stay out of our way. We'll handle the running game. Just
get out of the way. We don't need any of your help. They're not
going to block me. They're not going to block…' right down the
line, 'Jim Burt, [Lawrence] Taylor, Harry [Carson], [Carl]
Banks. You guys just stay out of the way. We'll handle the
running game. They're not going to block all of us. They might
get one of us every once in a while, but they can't block
us. You guys just cover the pass.' Really that's the way Taylor
looked at it. That's the way Banks looked at it. They knew there
were guys assigned to block them. You think they were going to
run a play and let Lawrence Taylor go unblocked? 'You can't
block me.'"
14 oct 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
penalties
"All of the penalties fall into basically four
categories, other than a few random plays. It's four categories.
So if you can ever improve in one of those four categories, or
improve in all four of them, then you would be the least
penalized team in the league…. Block in the back in the
kicking game. Offensive holding. Defensive-pass type of
penalties – interference, illegal contact, holding, whatever you
want to call that stuff. Then line of scrimmage penalties – false
starts, illegal motion, the plays that involve a lineman at the
line of scrimmage. Too many guys in the backfield, all of that.
That's what it comes down to. It's line of scrimmage. It's
defensive pass penalties. It's offensive holding and it's
penalties in the return game, in terms of blocking in the back.
Those are the four major categories. You're going to have an
intentional grounding. You're going to have a delay of game.
You're going to have a late hit. There are going to be some of
those, and they're no good either. But, the majority of the
penalties, probably 75 percent of all penalties, fall into those
four basic categories."
13 oct 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
field goal ranges
"I think you need to know defensively what the maximum field
goal range of your opponent is. If you're calling defenses, you
have to know what that line is. There are two field goal ranges:
there's what I would call a desperation range and then there's
what's legitimate field goal range."
10 oct 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
players fitting the system
"You definitely go through a stage, most coaches do, where
you see a good player and you get enamored. You really like what
the player does, but then when you put him into your system,
it's not quite the same player that he was in another system. He
has some strengths, but you can't utilize all those strengths.
If you try to utilize all his strengths, you end up weakening a
lot of other players who are already in your system."
07 oct 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
positives and negatives in every game
"I think there are always positives. When you win there are
always some negatives, some things that you could do better.
When you lose there are always some positive things, either
plays or things within a play that were positive, but
collectively it needs to be better than that. And there are too
many negative things that overwrote it, that's for sure. So the
ones that were good we'll try to build on, and we'll try to
correct the ones that weren't. But that's pretty much the way it
is every week."
03 oct 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
footing
"I think that if a player doesn't play with proper body
control and doesn't play with his feet under him, then he's
going to end up on the ground. If he ends up on the ground,
that's usually not good."
23 sept 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
adversity in football
"Football is a game where everybody gets knocked down sooner or later – usually
sooner. Then you get up and then you get knocked down again. That's what
football is. It's a lot like life in some respects. You're always going to have
to deal with some form of adversity in this game. Every team is. Every player
is. Every play is not an 80-yard touchdown. Every play is not a strip sack. Some
bad things happen on plays. Some good things happen on plays. That's the ebb and
flow of the game, and it goes like that within a season. It goes like that
within a career, just about anybody's career. Maybe how one person handles it at
one point and how they handle it at a different point, maybe that is the same.
Maybe it isn't. But, everybody goes through it and everybody is going to have to
deal with it. Every team has it. Every player has it. Every coach has it. That's
just part of it. Just like it's part of life, it's not all roses."
21 sept 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
crowd noise
"All stadiums are loud on the road. It'll be loud next week. We'll have to
deal with it. Everybody deals with it when they come to our place. That's the
way it is in the NFL. That's the way stadiums are. That's football."
18 sept 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
offensive football
"A lot of times, offensively, you just end up BYOB – be your own blocker. You
gotta run over somebody."
16 sept 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
what makes a great play
"I think his ability to block out the situation, to block out any exterior
distractions and just focus on the execution of that play. Ultimately, what
makes it a great play is the execution of the play – the throw, the catch, the
tackle, the kick or whatever it is – and that's just being able to totally
concentrate and focus and execute on his assignment on that particular play. So,
to be able to take out the situation, to take out the crowd, to take out the
magnitude of the play and just deal with the execution of that particular skill
at that point. To me that's what it is."
15 sept 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
what he looks for in a player
"That's really what you're looking for out of any player, is somebody that
can be dependable, can be consistent and can do things right on a basis that you
can really count on."
15 sept 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
playing at a high level
"I think that any player, once they step out on the field and start playing,
they better play at a high level or it might not be a happy ending."
18 aug 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
hitting
"When you step out on the field, you're trying to hit them, they're trying
to hit you. That's the game."
18 aug 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
practice
"Practice preparation becomes game reality."
02 aug 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
the 3-4 defense
"Joe Collier was my first exposure to the true 3-4 defense as we know it.
Prior to that I was at Detroit. In Detroit we ran the 3-4 defense, but we ran it
out of a 4-3 and the linebacker over a tight end was a down lineman, that was
Kenny Sanders. And it had all the principles and elements of a 3-4 defense. It
just had a defensive end on the tight end but they still had the two bubbles on
the guard, still had a weakside linebacker pulling him off on the open side. In
that particular defense which was Jimmy Carr was the coordinator, Jerry
Glanville, Fritz Shurmur, Floyd Reese, that was an all-star staff. That was
predicated on pressure, and when I say heavy blitzing, I'm talking in the
neighborhood of 50 blitzes per game in some games, extremely heavy blitzing and
pressure. When I went to Denver, Joe's defense was the true 3-4 with multiple
fronts. Most games we went into with 50 fronts, so it wasn't the straight 3-4,
it was the shaded noses, kicked-down ends, walked-up linebackers and that kind
of thing. So the scheme of that was a lot different and we never blitzed, twice
a game maybe. It was all primarily coverage-oriented multiple, multiple fronts.
And so that was the big contrast between those two systems. It was interesting.
And both of them were very successful. Then when I came to New York we were 4-3
defense in '79 and '80. But when Bill (Parcells) came from New England he
brought that defense down, and (Chuck) Fairbanks and those guys ran it with the
Patriots, and it was back to the traditional 3-4 but without the front variation that we had in Denver. And we played the same front in New York with (Jim) Burt
on the nose, (George) Martin and (Curtis) McGriff at the left end and (Leonard)
Marshall at the right end. And there was hardly any fluctuation on that, and we
tried to expand the coverages and pressures a little bit. It's an interesting
combination. I'd say what we do now has elements of all three of those in it.
Just going back to that for a second, one thing there was a lot less to defend.
There was a lot less one-back that we saw until Joe Gibbs came to Washington.
There was very little shotgun. There was very little nickel. It was almost 3-4
on first down, second down, third down in the red area. Now it's everything but
that. I think that had a lot to do with those systems. We're dealing with a much
different set of problems on the offensive side of the ball, whatever defense
you're playing these days."
04 feb 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
game management
"I think game management is
something you probably learn a little bit about in every single game. You
prepare certain situational strategies, and plays to use in those situations, at
the beginning of the season, and sometimes modify them a little bit as you go
through the year – maybe as new situations occur, or as your personnel changes, or your groupings
get modified a little bit through the course of the season. But they're not
always quite the way you draw them up. There are always some little wrinkles – field position, field conditions, the weather, time, timeouts, score, etc. So I
think you're always learning on that. And it's something that as a coach, and as
a quarterback, and as a coordinator and a play-caller, you've always got to stay
on top of. You've always got to keep thinking about it. And the more you think
about it, I think the quicker you can react when those situations do occur in
the game. But it's tough. It's a lot easier when you can plan ahead. The
toughest ones are the ones that change in a hurry."
03 feb 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
field conditions
"I'm sure the field will be the same condition for both teams."
12 jan 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
halftime adjustments
"We don't wait till halftime. By the second series in the game, certainly by
the end of the first quarter, unless it's a very unusual game, the game is
declared."
jan 2005 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
what he wants in a player
"A coach wants consistency and he wants dependability. There isn't really a
higher adjective you could put as a compliment to a player than a consistent,
dependable player. You want to know what you are going to get and you want to be
able to count on it. If it is at the player's approximate potential level, then
what more can you ask for? But it's hard when you go out there, and when the
ball is snapped and you just don't know what the guy is going to do. [He] might
do the right thing. [He] might do the wrong thing. He might make a good play, he
might make a bad play, he might make a bad decision or he might make a good
decision. You just have no idea. It's hard to count on that, and it's hard for
his teammates to count on that. Sometimes it's inexperience and hopefully it
will improve. If it doesn't then you just have to really wonder how far you can
go with that type of performance."
15 nov 2004 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
if a certain receiver would see the ball a lot that week
"If he's open."
20 oct 2004 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
goals and football
"Football is a lot of short-term goals."
08 sept 2004 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
quarterbacks:
"The quarterback is the most important position because, basically, the ball
is in his hands the most. He has a lot of responsibilities and has to make
decisions based on what he sees or thinks. It's important he understands what
the head coach is looking (to accomplish). By nature, he is the coach on the
field because he has the ball so often. He needs to understand what we, as a
team, want to accomplish. That's not to say he doesn't have (leeway) in making
decisions."
the coach/quarterback relationship
"Respect. It's the most important aspect of a coach and quarterback
relationship. The quarterback has to believe in what the coach wants to do. And
the coach has to trust the quarterback."
Marchibroda & Jones
Ted Marchibroda and Bert Jones had a very good working relationship.
They had two distinct personalities. Bert was an outspoken, excitable player,
probably a little more than Ted would have liked. But they both respected each
other's role. Bert respected what Ted wanted done. They won a lot of games
together."
Phil Simms
"Phil did not get or seek special treatment. He'd lift weights with the
offensive linemen. He'd talk to guys on defense all the time. I think the
players see that and respect it. His teammates looked at him as a football
player, and not just the quarterback. It means a lot."
05 sept 2004 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
consistency
"Our overall philosophy is to try to be consistent, not to do everything and
try to have this one big year and the next year we know we're going to pay the
price. Anybody can do it once, but whether it's your effort in the weight room,
your performance on the field, the team performance over an extended period of
time over the season, it's always brought back to consistency is what a champion
does."
08 aug 2004 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
a lack of versatility
"If you can only be good at one thing, you'd better be really, really,
really good at it, and it better make a difference in the game, or we can't
afford it."
08 aug 2004 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
mixing their defenses and coverages
"Really it goes all the way back to the Giants days. We had a three man line
with the Giants. We had Lawrence Taylor and he rushed 85-90 percent of the time.
You can call it whatever you want – 3-4 or 4-3 – but we had four guys coming and he
was usually one of them. That transitioned to when I went to Cleveland and
playing with a true four man line where (Anthony) Pleasant and (Rob) Burnett
were the defensive ends. At the Jets we were a combination 30-40 team and that's
been true since I would say '97 where we've used both fronts in the same season
on a number of occasions and by different game plans. Coverage wise we've had a
number of different coverages, and of course cover 2 is a key component for us.
On a game plan basis, week to week, we try to do what we think we need to do to
stop the other team's passing game, running game and general overall offensive
attack."
28 jan 2004 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
playing physical
"Football is a contact sport. Being able to control the line of scrimmage,
and cause turnovers with contact, and jam receivers and that kind of thing, is
very important in terms of controlling the tempo of the game. Offensively it's
the same thing, they're trying to do that to you and you've got to be able to
hold your ground and battle back on that. I think that is always a significant
part of the game, being physical, initiating the contact, being aggressive and
making sure that on the football field you are able to hold your ground and
control your turf."
28 jan 2004 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
when he started breaking down game film
"I felt comfortable breaking down film as a teenager. … I did some my
first year with the Colts in a job I didn't deserve. I wasn't being paid
anything. I wasn't worth anything."
20 jan 2004 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
injury information
"We comply with the league mandates and the league rules about injury
information on a weekly basis to the best of our knowledge. There is no perfect
situation when you are dealing with that because nobody can accurately predict
exactly how long an injury is going to take. I remember when Michael Vick got
hurt in preseason he was going to miss six weeks. He didn't play until December.
There are plenty of cases where you can be wrong on that when you try to read
that crystal ball. Our situation is we evaluate them day to day. When they are
better and they are well enough to play we put them out there. When they are
not, they don't."
15 jan 2004 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
being a complete player
"I think to be a player you have to be a complete player. You can't just run
one route or just do one thing, have one move. If that is all you have, it
better be really, really special or they are going to take it away."
12 nov 2003 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
bad plays
"You have to have a short memory at corner. Everybody gives up a completion
at corner. You have to have a short memory at quarterback. Every quarterback has
interceptions. You have to put those plays behind you and be able to go on and
still make a good play after that and not let it drag you down."
2 oct 2003 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
how much a player needs to practice
"My first year that I came into the league with the Colts in 1975, the
middle linebacker was Mike Curtis. About six or seven games into the season he
was traded and Jim Cheyunski was our middle linebacker. We won like the last
eight or nine regular season games, I forgot what is was, and ended up going
10-4 and winning the division that year and lost to Pittsburgh in the playoffs.
Cheyunski was a guy that we had gotten from Buffalo and he had bad knees. When
we got him, there was kind of a split feeling between, 'Yeah he is a pretty good
player, but his knees are so bad, he is never going to be able to play.' And the
decision was made, 'Well, we got to get him because we lost Curtis because they
traded him, so we have to get him. We have to do what we have to do to get him
and get him out there.' So Cheyunski never practiced on Wednesday. He never
practiced on Thursday. He went out there on Friday and did the walk throughs and
probably did about 10 plays in practice every week. He played hard and played
well on Sunday and I am thinking how is this possible? How can a guy really not
practice, and it wasn't like he was with us in training camp either, but go out
there and play as well as he did on a consistent basis week-after-week. Then he
would come in on Monday and couldn't walk, and then start the process all over
again. By Friday there was enough oil in his joints where he could go out there
and take a few plays and then play on Sunday. I don't know how he did it then
and looking back on it I still don't know how he did. But I learned a lesson right there that first year that guys are different. Some players can draw from
their experience and take mental reps and convert it into physical execution on
Sunday with less practice time. They can also take a situation where you look at
a guy and say, 'This guy can't even walk,' and then somehow he plays. Again, he
played on a division-winning team. It wasn't like we just lost and we were just
terrible. He played well and the team played well. I found that out my first
year. That has stuck with me all the way through. You just don't count guys out.
Everybody is different. I am not saying that everybody could do what he did.
Some can and I am sure some couldn't. That is what separates individuals."
2 oct 2003 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
defenses that fit the situation
"To me, in all phases of the game, you have to have enough so you can
counter your opponent but keep it simple enough so your players can execute. You
don't want to give them too much, but you don't want to be predictable, either.
So that's where you are constantly finding that balance. You can't stop
everything on offense but you do stop the variable that is most important in
your particular matchup. So, I want defenses used in a game that are structured
for situations – for stopping a particular player, for the two-minute situation,
for when teams are throwing the ball. I want defense that addresses problems."
| | |