All Things Bill Belichick
     
 

Bill Belichick Press Conference


 
 

New England Patriots
December 15, 2006

 
     
 

BB: Watching Houston here on the goal-line, they're the second-best team in the goal-line area offensively. I think that's really a good quality for a team to have, to be able to get the ball in the end zone. It's a good offensive mentality, about finishing drives and certainly running the ball down there is a big part of it, and they do a good job of that. They have a lot of good, complementary plays to go with it, just like they do in their regular field running game, with boots and play-actions and stuff like that. They're doing a good job there. Again, I think one of the big challenges in this game for us is going to be special teams. These guys are right at the top of the league in punt and kickoff coverage, and their return game has certainly picked up in the last few weeks, particularly with [Jerome] Mathis being back. Special teams will be a big factor for us here. Of course, they have an excellent kicker. Those are a couple areas we have to continue to focus and prepare for this week, because they are some of the things Houston does extremely well. They do a lot of things well, and those things are right at the top.

Q: Do they throw a lot on the goal line?

BB: They mix it up. They mix it up. They keep you off-balance. That would be the best way I could put it. They keep you off-balance.

Q: [Eric] Moulds has hurt you a lot in the past when he was in Buffalo, but he hasn't seen the ball as much.

BB: He's killed us.

Q: Do you expect to see a little bit of a difference there because of what he's been able to do in the past to you guys?

BB: I'm sure that Moulds can't wait to play against us. He's had some of the best games of his career against the Patriots. He's had a great career, but I know he has to be well over 1,000 yards. I'm sure if he could play the Patriots more frequently, he would have even bigger numbers. He's a good player. He's big. He's fast. He's physical. He's hard to tackle. He can definitely get open. He's a great compliment with [André] Johnson. You have those guys outside and that opens up the running games and the tight ends inside and the tight ends have gotten a lot of balls and the backs have caught a lot of balls. Teams are playing a lot of two deep coverage against them and try to roll up on their outside receivers and that's created opportunities for the running game and for the tight ends inside. Those tight ends have a lot of passes. Part of it is just because the safeties are either deep or they're extended and worried about the receivers and what you have to do. With Moulds and Johnson, you have to be concerned about them.

Q: One thing about [Gary] Kubiak's offense, you get different looks. They're very multiple. It seems like the last few weeks they've tightened it up a bit. Is that not the case?

BB: I think that through the course of the game you're going to get a lot of different looks. They're going to give you two backs in the backfield, one back in the backfield, one receiver, two receivers, three receivers, some three receivers and two tight ends with no backs. They do those things in all different downs and distances. You see a lot of teams on third down with certain personnel groups as their third-down grouping. You're definitely not going to get that out of Houston. They're going to give you all of their different groupings on every down. So they really don't have a third-down offense per se any more than they have a first down offense per sé. You could get what we normally think of as third-down plays on first down and first down plays on third down and all in between. They're hard to prepare for from that standpoint. And it really makes you defend every situation to the false degree as opposed to being able to boil it down and segment it into what they're only going to be in, three receivers and a back on third down, but that's not true. They're not a shotgun team, so the back is almost always behind the quarterback. That's where all of their runs come from. They're not afraid to run it on third down. They're not afraid to get three receivers and throw it on first down. So you have to defend the entire offense pretty much on an every down basis. That stretches you. It really does.

Q: When you have a returner like Mathis, I'm assuming he is similar to [Devin] Hester with blinding speed...

BB: I'd say they're different players. He's fast. Probably not as strong a runner as Hester is, but fast and has really good vision.

Q: When you're facing a player like that, do you cover kickoffs any differently when a guy can just flat out run by everybody?

BB: Well, it depends on the running style and the type of returns that they have. It's like defending against different running backs. You play them different to try to take away the things that they do the best and make sure that they don't hurt you with those. Just like playing offense and defense, you play the different blocking schemes that they have and you try to fit so that you have good leverage on the ball. It's the same thing on the returns. You try to have the right fit on the return so that they don't block you in such a way that it just opens up the coverage. It's a combination of playing the scheme and then also understanding who they're playing against, the type of runner that returner is or the running back is.

Q: Do your cover guys have to get off the blocks quicker against a guy like that just because when you're facing more of a tailback type of returner, a bigger returner, maybe there's not that heightened sense of, 'Okay, I have to get down. I have get off my block and I have to make that play if he comes close to my lane?'

BB: But there is that sense, it doesn't...

Q: Well I'm just saying do you have to get off quicker?

BB: No, I think you have to be careful about doing it too quick because when you're up against a quick guy, as soon as you jump off of something then he's on the other side of it and he's in the gap that has been vacated. I think you have to be more disciplined about staying in the area that you have and in the leverage that you have until you're sure that the runner can't get to that leverage. Once you've secured that, then you want to adjust your coverage to help as much as you can somewhere else. I think you have to stay longer in your area of responsibility because that's what the guy is looking for. He has vision on the whole field on a kickoff return and he's starting one place and as soon as he sees it start to overplay, then he's able to adjust and he can get to it. Whereas a lot of guys, they might see it, but by the time they get there you have more time to recover. You have to defend the whole field with him now. He can go sideline to sideline and anywhere up in between.

Q: Is [DeMeco] Ryans one of those guys that fits the 4-3 defense but not necessarily the 3-4 because of his size?

BB: I think he's a good enough player to play in any defense. I think size is a little bit of an issue, although I think that he plays strong and he has good quickness. He's able to take care of himself in there. If you're playing inside linebacker, it doesn't make any difference what system you're in, you're going to have to deal with those guys in the interior of the line and he does. His way of dealing with them is a little different than maybe somebody else that has a different physical makeup. He's quick. He's instinctive. He plays with good angles. He uses his hands well and he's a good tackler. He knows where the ball is. He's instinctive and that's probably the most important thing for a linebacker is instincts, because then if you can just get half-a-step ahead of where the offense is expecting you to be, then you have a chance to kind of scrape off of those blocks and not have to deal with them full force than if you're kind of a step-and-a-half or a half-a-step behind.

Q: Could he fit in a 3-4 at all though?

BB: Sure. I think he could fit in any defense.

Q: Did anything jump out at you from the [Oakland] game about him? He was really active and productive in that game.

BB: He's had a lot of production. He's had a bunch of sacks. He's had a lot of production. He had in that game. He's pretty much had it in a lot of games. You don't have any problem seeing him make plays because he makes them every game. But they played well against Oakland defensively. Obviously they played well. They turned the ball over. They were the difference, that and the return game, that was the difference in the game.

Q: You talked about Moulds having a lot of production against you. In your experience, I'm sure you've had other individuals like that, guys who, even if they changed teams, it just seems like they have your number.

BB: He definitely comes to mind.

Q: Ricky Proehl, I guess, would be a guy that you've talked about like thatnot to the extent of Moulds.

BB: We've only played him a couple of times. Moulds has definitely been in a lot of different systems. He's been with several different quarterbacks in Buffalo, several different offensive systems, going all the way back to [Doug] Flutie and Rob Johnson. He's probably been with five quarterbacks there, [Drew] Bledsoe, [JP] Losman, [Kelly] Holcomb. Even though he was with the same team, he was in a lot of different offensive systems and he was a problem.

Q: In your experience, when you have a guy like that, does it seems like it doesn't matter you just hate to see him?

BB: When they make enough plays against you it does, that's right. It's hard watching him. You've seen him in 80 for so many years and now you're seeing another 80 that's just as good and you have him in 84. Watching 80 catch the ball, and you're thinking there's Moulds and it's no, that's [André] Johnson and there's Moulds over there. Those guys are big and they're tough. They're two tough guys to play against. They really are.

Q: Their offense has struggled though, you talked about how good they are in the red zone and goal line, but they don't get to the goal line that often.

BB: Yeah, but nobody has stopped them on the goal line. They are 15 out of 17 down there. The only team that is better is San Diego. When you go through a team sequentially, like we do in the preparations, and you look at first down and third down and red area and two-minute and goal line, I'm just saying that the goal line jumps out at you. Every time they have the ball down there, they finish in the end zone. They're hitting passes. They're running it in. I'm just saying that they're good down there. You can say that they're no good, but they're 15 out of 17. Everybody that gets San Diego would like to have that percentage, believe me. They do a good job and it's like Denver. Denver does a good job down there, too. Obviously, it's a lot of the same scheme and it's good players making good plays down there. A mobile quarterback. Good runners. One-on-one out there with André Johnson, just lob it up there to him. You have a lot of things to defend. It's tough.

Q: If you look at the distribution of their sacks, their linebackers have a high number of them. Are they a pretty heavy blitzing team?

BB: Yes. They blitz a lot.

Q: Are you going to see a lot of the Denver type of blitzes with 11-up?

BB: No, they don't do that much. In fact, they really haven't done it at all, a play or two, but no. If you were going to take one word to describe their defense, that's what it would be, pressure. They're a pressure team. They blitz zone. They man zone. They mix in enough coverages so that it's not all blitz, but they're going to blitz. That's what they do. The more it's a passing situation, the more they're coming.

Q: Do they blitz a lot? Are you going to see a lot of them overloading one side?

BB: Well the zone blitzes are overload blitzes. In other words, if you're going to bring a lot of people off one side, then you can't put people over there to cover. You kind of have to leverage a couple of receivers with a guy inside and a guy outside. If you're going to man them, then you have to come from a more balanced front and put people over where the multiple receivers are and so the overload is created by the formation, not by the blitz. In a zone blitz, the overload is created by the blitz, not necessarily the formation. But they do both. They do both and they bring their safeties. They bring their linebackers. They bring different combinations. That's what you have to deal with, but you're going to have to block all of them sooner or later. They're all coming. But the linebackers come a lot, but the secondary, they blitz them as well, so it's not just a linebacker blitz team, but they come a lot. They get good production from linebacker blitzes.

Q: Is the relationship between the quarterback and the head coach the most important relationship on the team in a sense?

BB: That's a good question. I think it's an important relationship. Let me put it that way. I don't know. I guess it would depend on the makeup of the individual team and the coach. Some teams where the head coach basically is the offensive coordinator and calls the plays and runs the offense, the dynamic of the team is a little bit different than teams that are structured in different ways. I don't know. That's an interesting question.

Q: If there's some lack of trust there, doesn't it affect how you relate to the entire team in a sense?

BB: Yes, well I don't think there should be a lack of trust anywhere. If you're the coach and you don't want the player out on the field, then you shouldn't put him out there. You should put somebody else out there that you have confidence in, whatever position that is. I wouldn't limit it to anything. What are you going to do if you feel that way about your tackle? Let him protect the guy that you do feel confident in? Whoever it is, you have to put players out there that you have confidence in and believe in. If you don't, they shouldn't be out there. You should find somebody else that you can feel that way about. That's an interesting question and it's a point that comes up a lot. I'm sure every head coach deals with it. I certainly do. In our case, you have 53 active players and you have another, probably, 15 guys at some point in the year between practice squad, injured/reserve and PUP, or whatever. You're looking at 65 to 70 players on your team when you include everybody. So your relationship with all 70 of those players is, in some respects, the same, but in many respects is different. It's impossible on a week-to-week basis to have a very close interaction with 70 people and still do the things that I need to do as a head coach in terms of preparation with our staff and my personal preparation for the game. There's some of that one-on-one interaction relationship. Some of it is done in a team setting and some of it is done in a group setting or through an intermediary group, like the captains, that may bring things to my attention on behalf of the team or they may take things to the team on my behalf that I would rather have the messages delivered in smaller groups rather than the entire team. There are some different dynamics there and I think that there is, again, in some respects the relationships are similar, in other respects they're different. That's probably a little bit of a team-to-team thing. I think if you could ask any player about every team that he's played for, he'd be able to say, 'This is the difference between this coach and that coach and that coach and the next coach.' Rather than, 'These four guys were exactly the same.' I doubt I would get that.

Q: When you stack up your advantages over other teams in the league, it's obvious that one of your strongest advantages is your relationship that you have with Tom Brady. You have a take a guy that the entire team respects and a guy that you can put anything on he delivers for you.

BB: Believe me, I've said many times, there's no quarterback that I'd rather have than Tom Brady. I have tremendous respect for Tom and what he does and how he does it. There's no issue there. I have confidence in all of the players that are on the roster and all of the players that go into the game. If I didn't, then believe me, they wouldn't be on the roster and I certainly wouldn't put them in a game. That's just how I personally feel. I can't really relate to that, 'Well this guy is on the team, but we don't have confidence in him. We don't think he can.' I would never put him out there. I just wouldn't. I'm not saying we have the best players in the league, I'm not trying to represent that either, where a player that we have is better than everybody else. But I think that every player we put out there I feel like can do what they're being asked to do and they've worked hard and they've shown us in practice or in the opportunities that they've had, whatever they may be, that they can go out and do those jobs. If I don't feel that way about them, believe me, they would never see the field.

Q: What do you hope and expect that Chad Jackson would learn from this season and what he could take away from it?

BB: Right now the most important thing for Chad is the most important thing for all the rest of us and that is Houston. It's a one-week season. There are three days left in this week. I hope he gets the most out of today and the most out of the next two days of our preparation, and the most out of Sunday, whatever that is. Whether he's active, inactive, whether he plays or doesn't play, how much he plays if he plays, I don't know the answer to any of those questions, but whatever they are, I hope he gets the most out of each of those days. And I'd say that for every other player on our team. Next week is next week. It will be a one-week season then, too, so we'll start to do the same process. That's the way I look at it.

Q: How about long-term and the bigger picture?

BB: Right now there is no big picture. There is Houston that's it. What else is there? There is Houston. That's it. That's all we have right now. That's the only thing we can worry about. So to waste time on a bunch of other stuff, to me it's a waste of time.

 
     
  © 2006 New England Patriots