All Things Bill Belichick
     
 

Bill Belichick Post-Draft Radio Interview


 
 

WEEI
May 2, 2006

 
     
 

Glenn Ordway: Well I guess you're happy with your draft. Is there any coach out there that's ever dissatisfied with their draft the day after or two days after the draft?

Bill Belichick: I think just in relative terms, Glenn, you select players and you bring them onto your team and...everybody feels they've improved their team. I mean, how could you not improve it by adding some young players to work with? But the degree that each team improves relative to the competition, that's another story. But every team got better on draft weekend, I don't think there's any doubt about that.

Ordway: Going into the draft, people always think that certain teams are going to do certain things. And then when they don't on that weekend it's always this question of 'Why?' I think a lot of people felt going into this draft you would go for defense. Instead, you went for offense. Was it simply a matter of value and where you drafted? If a defensive player were there in one of those first two spots, would you have taken him if you perceived that it was greater value for you?

Belichick: Oh, sure. We've drafted plenty of defensive players since we've been here. We'll take the player that feels like is the best value to the football team. We're not going to discriminate on that. No, it's just that's the way it worked out. We felt like Laurence [Maroney] was a good value at his spot. And we saw Chad [Jackson] slip a little bit into the second round and we were able to move up and take him. Those types of things occur in every draft. There were a lot of other good players up there, players that we had rated highly, players that are going to be good players in the league. That's just the way it is.

Pete Sheppard: Coach, can I ask specifically why Laurence Maroney was higher on your list than, say, DeAngelo Williams?

Belichick: Well again, Pete, I think there's a lot of good players there. We just felt like in what we ask the backs to do and with what Laurence's skills are...I think he's a very versatile player—he can play on early downs and run the ball, he's a good kick returner, he's got good hands, he's been durable, he's a smart kid—he brings a lot of good things to our team. We just felt that in the end he gave us the most value. Again, that's not to take anything away from a lot of the other great backs that were out there, like [DeAngelo] Williams and [Joseph] Addai and [Leon] Washington and all those guys. I'm sure they'll all do well too. But in our system we just felt like he was the best pick for us...

Sheppard: He's also caught 17 passes last year. His pass reception [inaudible] the last three years. I know that's something that you liketo use the backs as pass receivers when you can.

Belichick: Right. Well, it's been an interesting situation. Minnesota has historically had a number of good backs on their team. Two years ago it was Maroney and [Marion] Barber. When those two players were on the field, Barber was usually the split out guy and Laurence was the guy that remained in the backfield. It's similar to but different than the Carnell Williams-Ronnie Brown scenario at Auburn last year when Brown was out of the backfield a lot. But anyway...and then this year after Barber was drafted and went to Dallas it was Maroney. And he was in there with a freshman. They elected to split Maroney out and use him as more of a receiver kind of like they did Barber the year before, and the freshman got some of those carries and played in the backfield. So I don't think there's any doubt that Laurence has some ability to do those things. Again, I think it was part of the system that they were using and the personnel that they had. It's interesting how one year he was the guy that kind of stayed in the backfield, the next year he was the guy that they moved out. So I think that really is a little bit of a commentary on his versatility.

Sean McAdam: Bill, you talked about sort of the age of many of your veteran running backs, including [Kevin] Faulk and [Corey] Dillon obviously with seven and eight years in the league, and the need to get younger at that position. I'm wondering, was there any appeal to bring a younger guy in to "push" Corey Dillon a little bit in terms of competition?

Belichick: I don't think that's that big of a deal. Corey's a hard-working guy and football is important to him. He's working hard and he'll be ready to go. So is Kevin and so is Patrick [Pass]. So I don't think it's about that. I think it's just about...you know, when you have a football team you have to have depth at every position. When you have three backs on the roster that are primary ball carriers that are in their seventh year or longer in terms of experience, at some point you want to add a younger player. It's just normal.

McAdam: In the first round, Bill, did it trend out exactly or like you thought it would starting at the very top? A lot of people were surprised about the New Orleans pick. Did it trend out how you thought it would in terms of the guy and the positions being taken and how it panned out?

Belichick: First of all, I don't think we were that concerned about the top part of the round. When you're at 21 like we were, it didn't really matter whether Hawk goes 3 or 5 or 7, or Bush goes 1 or 2, or Ferguson goes 2, 4, 6. It doesn't really matter where those guys go; we're not going to see them. I think there was a clear-cut group of players—[Vince] Young, [Matt] Leinart, guys like that—that were going to go at the top of the round. That was pretty clear the way that that was going to go. So again, just in terms of the draft strategy, we don't really worry too much about that. And in all honesty, I didn't spend a lot of time scouting some of those players myself becauseguys like [Jay] Cutler and Leinart and Young—we weren't going to see them. We tried to focus more on the guys we felt like would be, not necessarily at 21, but at least in range, in the teens, where you could possibly move up or back in the draft from that point on. Are they good players? Sure. Could one guy have gone ahead of another one? They probably could have. I don't even really know that much about it, to be honest with you.

Ordway: Well you obviously moved up 16 spots in that second round for [Chad] Jackson. I know those mock drafts don't mean an awful lot, but in many of them he was projected in that first round. Was there any thought process at all about Jackson when your first round came around?

Belichick: Sure, there were good players up there, but in the end we took Laurence Maroney because we felt he had the most value and was the best player for us at that point. But clearly in our move to ascend to a higher point in the second round we had high-grade values on Chad and felt fortunate to be able to move up there and select him at that spot. As we saw him still on the board and we could trade and move into that range then that's what we tried to do. No question about it, we had a high grade on Jackson as well.

Ordway: When you go up 16, how do you determineif you're sitting there watching and you're saying 'Man, we want this guy Jackson. We've got to move up'who is in line to take him? How do you determine that? How do you process that to figure out how far you have to go up? Or is it simply a guessing game—this is a team that looks like they may want a guy like Jackson?

Belichick: I think it's driven more by your evaluation of the draft. If you see a player and you have a certain value on the player and he's your last player, or he's either in that grade or at that position, and you see him still available and you think, 'Well okay, if we could draft this player at this point, this is something we want to do,' then you just start shopping. You start walking down the aisles. You call a team and say, 'Okay, would you want to trade this and this for your pick?' If they say no, then you go to the next team and say, 'Would you want to trade?' and [they say] 'No.' And if everybody says no, you don't move. And if somebody says yes, then you jump in there with them. Some teams that are at 32, 31, 29, whatever it is, they're sitting there saying, 'We want to pick a guy, we don't want to back up to where you are at 52.' Or they say, 'Well, here's what it would take.' And we'd have to determine at that point, well, that's more than we're willing to give up. Or maybe we would give it up. So that's kind of how it goes. But it's very fluid and it goes back and forth.

Ordway: Is there a point where you know that this guy is no longer going to be on the board? That there's a certain team that you figure...

Belichick: Again, I don't think 'no,' maybe, is the right word, Glenn, but I think we were convinced that he wouldn't have lasted on the board too much longer. And, in fact, in talking to some of the teams in there, I feel with great certainty that he wouldn't have gotten more than one or two picks further down the road.

Sheppard: Bill, is it fair to say that with Jackson and with Deion Branch, those are arguably the two fastest wide receivers you've had at one time since you've been head coach of this team? As far as all-out speed.

Belichick: Well I don't know, we've had some guys that could run. We had them on the team last year, the year before. I don't think you're going to find guys much faster than Bethel [Johnson]. André Davis was fast, Tim Dwightthose guys have been fast. David Patten. So, I don't know. I think the bottom line is...I mean speed's important, there's no question about it, and it's a great attribute. But for a receiver, a lot of things are important: number one being catching the ball, and number two, being able to get openwhether that's with speed, whether that's with quickness, whether it's with route running ability and technique. Say a player like Troy Brown—there's a whole package. And really all a quarterback wants, all Tom Brady wants, is somebody to get open.

Sheppard: He also talked about being a little bit uncomfortable with Urban Meyer as far as last year playing the inside slot and inside receiver. Will he play in that spot for you or will he strictly be a guy outside?

Belichick: I think that Chad's shown that he can play in both spots. He has played outside, he has played inside. We'll work him in our offense and see how he adapts his skills to our style of play and the routes we run and the plays and so forth. He'll get an opportunity to work at different spots and we'll see how that goes. He may be more effective in one spot or another, or there may be some advantages to playing in multiple positions. We'll just have to see how that goes. I wouldn't be able to commit to...really, I couldn't commit to any player's role at this point. But we'll take a look at him and see how it goes. The one thing about playing inside like Chad did last year is he caught a lot of balls in traffic, he caught a lot of balls with people hanging on him and hitting him after the catch. I think that spoke well to his concentration and his ability to catch the ball in close quarters.

McAdam: Bill, with the draft over the next thing on the calendar is guys who might be cap victims in early June. How much preparation can you do in looking around the league and trying to assess who might be out there, and are there people that you might expect to be able to bring in that can help you? Because you are under a little bit.

Belichick: Well, I have no idea whether anybody will work out to come here or not, but I think you have a sense of players who might—I'd say mightbe available. If the team didn't want them then they certainly would release them, but I think there are players that teams may be willing to part with. There were a number of players during the draft that you saw—some of those draft-day trades over the weekend where teams traded a player for a draft pick—well believe me, there are plenty of other players that were being shopped out there that, had a team that was willing to give up a draft pick, they could have gotten those players. So there's a possibility that those guys are available. I think there's also a possibility that players who went to teams that drafted a guy high, they may have other players at that position that now they're willing to try to trade because they've gotten a draft choice to take that spot. So I think we can do our homework. And again, the personnel situation in the league is a very fluid one. It's always moving. Scott [Pioli] and the scouts and the people in the personnel department keep up with each team—just about every team in the league—and talk to people on a regular basis. If there's somebody on the market, then we do our homework on them and see whether or not it's somebody we'd be interested inwhether it's a trade or whether we think that player might be released for cap reasons or other competitive reasons.

Ordway: You guys have had some good hits after that release on June 1st. But I'm wondering, since we had a substantial increase in the salary cap number this year, do you expect that that list will be shorter than normal?

Belichick: It might be. Yeah, I think it might be. I think teams are under less cap pressure this year than they have been in some other years—I'm saying on a league-wide basis. I think that's possible. But again, I think in terms of managing your team and managing your cap, you still want to keep an eye on the whole salary structure. I think teams will still continue to do that even if they're under it because any savings that you have, if you can utilize it in some better way, then it's worth doing that. So I think there will still be some players that fall into that category that financially teams just won't want to carry them.

Ordway: Alright, final question, because I know you've got to go back to work. Are there free agents right now, guys that fell through the cracks of the draft, that you've got interest in, that you're bringing in right now?

Belichick: Oh, absolutely. Yeah, absolutely. I think that this is a very important time to try to get players who weren't draftedyou know, it was only seven roundsplayers that weren't drafted that you want to try to bring into your team to compete for either roster spots or practice squad spots, and players that you want to work with and continue to develop. We've had a lot of success with players like thatguys like Mike Wright last year, and Randall Gay the year beforepeople like that that weren't drafted that ended up being good contributors for your team. I'm sure that in the next couple days...we've been in that recruiting process now, really since the seventh round of the draft. I'm sure that in the next few days we'll have some of those players wrapped up. We've been working on them. Scott and the scouts and the personnel department were absolutely after those guys to fill out the depth on our roster and let them compete for a spot and playing time.

Ordway: How does that scramble work? If two teams, three teams, five teams are interested in one guy, how do you get that guy?

Belichick: Well, sometimes it comes down to opportunity, sometimes it comes down to money and contract, sometimes it comes down to a relationship. Those players that aren't drafted get signing bonuses from teams. Not all of them, but some of them do. Again, I think that's something that in terms of managing your cap, managing your team, you have to be aware of because the more money you give out on signing bonuses to players that aren't drafted because of the rookie pool, the less money you have to sign your draft choices. So you've got to balance that. You just can't...it's not an endless supply of signing bonus money there. But if you really want somebodyI mean we've seen guys go for forty, fifty, sixty thousand dollar signing bonuses in previous years when the competition gets hot and the bidding gets up there. When it gets up to that point, you can look back in retrospect and say, 'Well, we should have drafted him in the seventh round.' But there are very few players that get up in the seventh round money. But anywhere from a couple thousand to ten thousand dollar signing bonus, that's not uncommon at all.

Ordway: Alright Bill, we'll let you get back to work....

 
     
  Transcribed by the webmaster.